The Supreme Court/The Supreme Court.iso/pc/ascii/1992/order/032392.zor

Text File | 1992-03-31 | 32.5 KB | 1,158 lines

  ORDER LIST

                          MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992



                      APPEALS -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

  90-1977   DUPREE, JOHNNY, ET AL. V. MOORE, ATTY. GEN. OF MISSISSIPPI

                     The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to

                the United States District Court for the Southern

                District of Mississippi for further consideration in

                light of Clark v. Roemer, 500 U.S. ____ (1991).

  91-1210   CLINTON, GOV. OF ARKANSAS V. JEFFERS, M.C., ET AL.

                     The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to

                the United States District Court for the Eastern

                District of Arkansas with instructions to enter a fresh

                judgment from which an appeal may be taken to the United

                States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.



                    CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

  90-1164   SMITH, WILLIE V. BLACK, COMMR., MISSISSIPPI DOC

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

                The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

                United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for

                further consideration in light of Stringer v. Black, 503

                U.S. ____ (1992).

  91-432    MOORE, RANDOLPH V. NEVADA

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

                The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

                Supreme Court of Nevada for further consideration in

                light of Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).

  91-701    ILLINOIS V. KELK, JOHN P.

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

                The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

                Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, for

                further consideration in light of Florida v. Jimeno, 500

                U.S. ____ (1991). Justice Stevens dissents.

  91-885    EASLEY, STEVEN L. V. SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING CORP.

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

                The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

                United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for

                further consideration in light of Southwest Marine, Inc.

                v. Gizoni, 502 U.S. ____ (1991).

  91-5293   FLANAGAN, DALE E. V. NEVADA

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the Supreme Court of Nevada for further

                consideration in light of Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S.

                ____ (1992).

  91-5787   PROWS, DARRELL V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of

                McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).

  91-6700   KOCHEKIAN, KENNETH M. V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of

                Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).

  91-7135   JEFFERIES, JEFFREY V. SOUTH CAROLINA

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina for

                further consideration in light of Yates v. Evatt, 500

                U.S. ____ (1991).




                         ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

  No. ----  MATTHEW J. TRAVERS, JR., ET AL. V. BULLIS SCHOOL, INC.

                    The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition

                for a writ of certiorari, out-of-time, is denied.

  D-1066    IN THE MATTER OF JAMES JOHN KROS

                     James John Kros, of Aurora, Illinois, having

                requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this

                Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the

                roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of

                this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on

                January 13, 1992, is hereby discharged.

  D-1068    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONNIE HOWARD WHITE

                     It having been reported to the Court that Donnie

                Howard White, of Georgetown, Kentucky, has been

                suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court

                of Kentucky and this Court by order of January 13, 1992,

                having suspended the said Donnie Howard White from the

                practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

                issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

                disbarred;

                     And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

                and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

                a response has expired;

                     It is ordered that the said Donnie Howard White be

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

                that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

                admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

  D-1069    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID BAKER

                     It having been reported to the Court that David

                Baker, of Avalon, New Jersey, has been disbarred from

                the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey

                and this Court by order of January 13, 1992, having

                suspended the said David Baker from the practice of law

                in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring

                him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

                     And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

                and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

                a response has expired;

                     It is ordered that the said David Baker be

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

                that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

                admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

  D-1074    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES F. CLEMENTS

                     It having been reported to the Court that James F.

                Clements, of Landover, Maryland, has been disbarred from

                the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland

                and this Court by order of January 21, 1992, having

                suspended the said James F. Clements from the practice

                of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

                requiring him to show cause why he should not be

                disbarred;

                     And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

                and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

                a response has expired;

                     It is ordered that the said James F. Clements be

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

                that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

                admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

  D-1075    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD E. PACK

                     It having been reported to the Court that Edward E.

                Pack, of Livingston, New Jersey, has been disbarred from

                the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey

                and this Court by order of January 21, 1992, having

                suspended the said Edward E. Pack from the practice of

                law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

                requiring him to show cause why he should not be

                disbarred;

                     And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

                and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

                a response has expired;

                     It is ordered that the said Edward E. Pack be

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

                that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

                admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

  D-1076    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN HERBERT RATLIFF

                     It having been reported to the Court that John

                Herbert Ratliff, of Somerville, New Jersey, has been

                disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court

                of New Jersey and this Court by order of January 21,

                1992, having suspended the said John Herbert Ratliff

                from the practice of law in this Court and directed that

                a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should

                not be disbarred;

                     And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

                and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

                a response has expired;

                     It is ordered that the said John Herbert Ratliff be

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

                that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

                admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

  D-1094    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HANS CHARLES OTTO FEIGE

                     It is ordered that Hans Charles Otto Feige, of

                Coral Springs, Florida, be suspended from the practice

                of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable

                within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he

                should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this

                Court.

  D-1095    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ADRIAN F. O'BRYAN

                     It is ordered that Adrian F. O'Bryan, of

                Louisville, Kentucky, be suspended from the practice of

                law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable

                within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he

                should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this

                Court.

  D-1096    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MAX CARLETON GARRICK, JR.

                     It is ordered that Max Carleton Garrick, Jr., of

                Whittier, California, be suspended from the practice of

                law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable

                within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he

                should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this

                Court.

  D-1097    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE ALAN FRIEDMAN

                     It is ordered that Bruce Alan Friedman, of Los

                Angeles, California, be suspended from the practice of

                law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable

                within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he

                should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this

                Court.

  D-1098    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL THOMAS KENNEY

                     It is ordered that Michael Thomas Kenney, of Santa

                Ana, California, be suspended from the practice of law

                in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

                forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

                not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

  90-1258   GOMEZ, WARDEN V. McKINNEY, MICHAEL

                     The motion of respondent to retax costs is granted.

  90-1918   KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INC. V. IOWA DEPT. OF REV. & FINANCE

                     The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to

                participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for

                divided argument is granted.

  90-8370   MEDINA, TEOFILO V. CALIFORNIA

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to file a

                supplemental brief after argument is denied.

  91-155  ) INT. SOC. FOR KRISHNA, ET AL. V. LEE, WALTER
          )
  91-339  ) LEE, WALTER V. INTL. SOC. FOR KRISHNA, ET AL.

                     The motion of petitioners /cross-respondents to

                strike amicus curiae brief of Airports Association

                Council International-North America is denied.

  91-538    FORSYTH CTY., GEORGIA V. NATIONALIST MOVEMENT

                    The motion of American Civil Liberties Union,

                et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae

                is granted. The motion of Public Citizen for leave

                to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

  91-542    WRIGHT, WARDEN, ET AL. V. WEST, FRANK

                     The motion of Benjamin R. Civiletti, et al. for

                leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The

                motion of Gerald Gunther, et al. for leave to file a

                brief as amici curiae is granted.

  91-744  ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA V. CASEY, ROBERT, ET AL.
          )
  91-902  ) CASEY, ROBERT, ET AL. V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA

                     The motion of Alan Ernest to represent children

                unborn and born alive is denied. The motion of Legal

                Defense for Unborn Children for leave to file a brief as

                amicus curiae is denied.

  91-790  ) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. V. EASTERWOOD, LIZZIE
          )
  91-1206 ) EASTERWOOD, LIZZIE V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

  91-1111 ) HARTFORD FIRE INS., ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
          )
  91-1128 ) MERRETT UNDERWRITING, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
          )
  91-1131 ) WINTHERTHUR REINSURANCE V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
          )
  91-1146 ) UNIONAMERICA INS., ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

                     The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in

                these cases expressing the views of the United States.

  91-849  ) BD. OF ED. SCHOOL DIST. 21 V. ILLINOIS ST. BD. OF ED.
          )
  91-865  ) ILLINOIS ST. BD. OF ED. V. BD. OF ED. SCHOOL DIST. 21

                     The motion of respondents Brozer, et ux. for

                assessment of attorney's fees and costs is denied.

  91-913    PATTERSON, JOHN V. SHUMATE, JOSEPH

                     The motion of David B. Tatge, Trustee, for leave to

                file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

  91-946    CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

  91-1188   ROWLAND, JAMES, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY

                     The motions of petitioners to dispense with

                printing the joint appendix are granted.

  91-6109   GILBERTSON, E.N. V. GRAHAM, ROBERT, ET AL.

                     The motion of respondent Walker for attorneys' fees

                is denied.

  91-6194   CROSBY, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion for appointment of counsel is granted

                and it is ordered that Mark D. Nyvold, Esquire, of St.

                Paul, Minnesota, is appointed to serve as counsel for

                the petitioner in this case.

  91-7064   TOLIVER, TOMMIE V. CTY. OF SULLIVAN, ET AL.

                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until

                April 13, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee

                required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in

                compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

                Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting: For

                the reasons expresed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464

                U.S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ

                of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion

                to proceed in forma pauperis.



                            CERTIORARI GRANTED

  91-871    BATH IRON WORKS CORP., ET AL. V. DIR., OFFICE OF WCP, ETC.

  91-948    CHURCH OF LUKUMI, ET AL. V. CITY OF HIALEAH

  91-998    CIR V. SOLIMAN, NADER E.

                     The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

  91-1158   MISSISSIPPI, ET AL. V. LOUISIANA, ET AL.

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted

                limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition

                and to the following question: Did the district court

                properly assert jurisdiction over respondent's third-

                party compliant against petitioner State of Mississippi?

  91-6824   ZAFIRO, GLORIA, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted.



                            CERTIORARI DENIED

  91-851    MEDLEY, ROSEMARY M. V. UNITED STATES

  91-929    KIMES, SANTE V. UNITED STATES

  91-942    RICHARDSON, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES

  91-944    COOPER ELECTRIC SUPPLY V. MARTIN, SEC. OF LABOR

  91-969    ALLEN, MICHAEL H. V. UNITED STATES

  91-982    EMPLOYEES OF BUTTE RAILWAY V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

  91-991    GRIFFEY, ALLEN V. UNITED STATES

  91-1006   U.S. MARINE CORP., ET AL. V. NLRB, ET AL.

  91-1007   CAINE, CURTIS V. HARDY, M. D., ET AL.

  91-1026   E. ALABAMA HEALTH CARE V. AUBURN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

  91-1036   JONES, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

  91-1041   TAITAGUE, GREGORIO, ET AL. V. FIRST ISLAND INDUS., ET AL.

  91-1062   SCHATZ, IVAN, ET UX. V. WEINBERG AND GREEN

  91-1068   EDWARDS, LARRY, ET AL. V. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE

  91-1139   FRANKLIN SAVINGS, ET AL. V. DIR., OFFICE OF THRIFT SUP.

  91-1175   MORGAN, DAVID V. COMMUNITY REDEV. AGENCY

  91-1178   BASHAM, DeWAYNE W. V. BLANKENSHIP, L. A., ETC.

  91-1184   ERICKSON, RUSSELL, ET AL. V. DESERT PALACE, ET AL.

  91-1191   HECKER, RICHARD V. FRANKLIN NATL. BANK

  91-1194   COMM. OF UNSECURED CREDITORS V. MELLON BANK, ET AL.

  91-1201   SHUTT, VINCENT V. SANDOZ CROP PROTECT., ET AL.

  91-1204   ROBINSON, NOAH V. SOUTH CAROLINA

  91-1205   LAVERGNE, CATHY V. CAMERON IRON WORKS

  91-1207   FRONT ROYAL INDUST. PARK V. FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA

  91-1212   MITCHELL, PORTER V. MOBIL OIL CORP., ET AL.

  91-1214   BROOKS, SIDNEY V. SULPHUR SPRINGS VALLEY ELEC.

  91-1219   CULLY, MARIE E. V. COTOFAN, ELI

  91-1222   CALIFORNIA ELEC. CO. V. BRILEY, PATRICK, ET AL.

  91-1224   OUZTS, PATRICIA V. SOUTH CAROLINA

  91-1226   DAVIS, J. O., ET AL. V. HOLLIS, O. P.

  91-1228   CSOKA, LOUIS V. WALDEN, WILLIAM, ET AL.

  91-1230   HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. V. MORRIS, JUDGE, ETC.

  91-1232   NORMAN, CYNTHIA, ETC. V. VEPCO

  91-1235   NAVARRO, SHERIFF V. REVIEW PUBLICATIONS, INC.

  91-1237   HAMILTON, ROBERT V. AIR JAMAICA, LTD.

  91-1238 ) PATY, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. PRICE, NUI LOA, ET AL.
          )
  91-1273 ) PRICE, NUI LOA, ET AL. V. HAWAII

  91-1244   HYPOINT TECH. V. HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.

  91-1246   ARLEN, BILLY V. UNITED STATES

  91-1247   MARX, DENNIS P. V. UNITED STATES

  91-1249   NOWERS, WILLIAM V. VIRGINIA

  91-1250   McALLAN, RICHARD J. V. KERR, JAMES, ET AL.

  91-1253   COOK, DONALD V. CAIN, CLARENCE

  91-1256   KLAVONICK, CHARLES V. IRONWORKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA

  91-1258   BOYD, JAMES, ET UX. V. FORD MOTOR CO., ET AL.

  91-1261   TEXAS V. WALKER, DANIEL

  91-1262   BOWERS, RICHARD, ET AL. V. PERKO, JAMES

  91-1264   SOEHNGEN, RICHARD V. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECT. BD.

  91-1277   FARSACI, STEVEN, ETC. V. BUSH, PRES. OF THE U.S.

  91-1279   KULZER, PAULINE, ETC. V. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS

  91-1287   IRBY, KEITH, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES

  91-1294   PARKER, RUTH A. V. NEW JERSEY

  91-1297   OHIO DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV. V. OHIO HOSP. ASSN., ET AL.

  91-1307   RANGEL, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES

  91-1318   METALLO, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES

  91-1336   REICHLIN, LEONARD V. WILLIAMS, NOVACK, ET AL.

  91-1338   GIRLING HEALTH SYSTEMS V. UNITED STATES

  91-1343   GOOS, KARL F. V. CIR

  91-1357   PERALTA, ROLANDO V. UNITED STATES

  91-1364   HASSNEH INS. CO. OF ISRAEL V. SUPER. CT. OF CALIFORNIA

  91-5006   J.E.B. V. WISCONSIN

  91-6461   CUNNINGHAM, BENNIE V. PETERS, DIR., ILLINOIS DOC

  91-6490   HESTER, NATALIE R. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6510   YOUNG, JERRY V. HERRING, ROBERT, ET AL.

  91-6611   PURVIS, JOHN G. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC

  91-6633   WILLIAMS, BRUCE V. OPM

  91-6661   GIBSON, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES

  91-6666   MOSCO, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES

  91-6676   ZAVESKY, DAVID A. V. SCHERERVILLE, INDIANA

  91-6693   FISHER, MANSON V. ALABAMA

  91-6722   KELLY, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES

  91-6726   PARMASAVAM, CHELIA V. UNITED STATES

  91-6742   WILLIAMS, ERIC D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6774   BARNETT, GARY W. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6805   BODRE, INGRID J. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6806   SWAN, LARRY, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6811   DUNNICK, ERIC B. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6814   FRAZIER, WAYNE V. OHIO

  91-6817   DONOVAN, ANTONIO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6825   DUNSON, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6833   NAVARRO-BOTELLO, JOSE V. UNITED STATES

  91-6839   OGUNLEYE, ADEMOLA M. V. INS

  91-6850   EDDMONDS, DURLYN V. ILLINOIS

  91-6853   CRUZ, RAMIRO V. UNITED STATES

  91-6869   ESCOLASTICO-DISLA, LUIS V. UNITED STATES

  91-6886   ABATE, TESHOME V. HUD, ET AL.

  91-6891   BEVILL, RANDY V. MISSISSIPPI

  91-6910   SOSA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES

  91-6953   COHEN, ERNEST V. SOUTH CAROLINA

  91-6965   PINKSTON, LEON D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6992   PEREZ, MAURICE C. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6995   ALLEN, JOHN B. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7007   KHAN, ABDUL Q. V. TANNER, J., ET AL.

  91-7017   FRALEY, DENNIS O. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7037   JONES, EARL P. V. CALIFORNIA

  91-7053   WHITLOCK, HERBERT V. O'LEARY, ASST DEPUTY, ET AL.

  91-7056   BATTENFIELD, BILLY R. V. OKLAHOMA

  91-7058   CUNNINGHAM, JERALD C. V. WOODMAN, M., ET AL.

  91-7060   CLARKE, JEROME V. CLARKE CTY., GEORGIA, ET AL.

  91-7062   SALIM, JABARI V. MURRAY, DIR., VIRGINIA DOC

  91-7063   N.S. V. EL PASO CTY., COLORADO

  91-7065   HARRIS, JAMES C. V. OKLAHOMA

  91-7066   HOLMAN, RICHARD V. O'LEARY, WARDEN

  91-7070   GONZALEZ-CALAS, JUAN C. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7071   DILL, EDWIN V. LOVE, SUPT.

  91-7074   BOUDETTE, GREGORY W., ET AL. V. CTY. OF YAVAPAI, ET AL.

  91-7075   RUIZ, GUSTAVO D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7079   RITCHERSON, MARY C. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7083   MOORE, RUSSELL V. FLORIDA

  91-7089   FRANZEN, BRUCE L. V. WRIGHT, ROBIN A., ET AL.

  91-7098   SULLY, ANTHONY J. V. CALIFORNIA

  91-7101   MONTGOMERY, JERRY V. UNIV. OF CHICAGO, ET AL.

  91-7102   THOMASON, CHARLES V. U. S. STEEL, ET AL.

  91-7104   MOISTER, ROGER W. V. FIRST NATL. BK. OF ATLANTA

  91-7111   SMITH, WILLIE V. LYNAUGH, JAMES, ET AL.

  91-7115   HARDING, JAMES V. REDMAN, WARDEN

  91-7118   BACCHUS, CAMERON D. V. POSTMAN, ALAN L.

  91-7120   SCOTT, JOHN V. TEXAS

  91-7123   SIMMONS, VERNON V. BEYER, SUPT., ET AL.

  91-7130   STARKS, RONALD V. McMACKIN, WARDEN

  91-7132   IDZIAK, STANLEY H. V. MICHIGAN

  91-7133   HENRY, CLIFFORD E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ

  91-7134   HOWARD, FORD V. ZIMMERMAN, CHARLES, ET AL.

  91-7136   IN RE JAMES M. JESSE

  91-7138   LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. PETERS, WARDEN

  91-7139   LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. JOHNSON, COMMR., ETC.

  91-7140   LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. ROPER, CHARLES, ET AL.

  91-7141   REININGHAUS, HAROLD E. V. REININGHAUS, SHERYL A.

  91-7145   GALBRAITH, SHERRY E. V. NORTHERN TELECOM, INC.

  91-7147   YIM, CHUNG K. V. PRELESNIK, WARDEN

  91-7149   FRANCOIS, BUCLAN V. DUGGER, SEC., FLORIDA DOC

  91-7150   HUNTER, CHARLIE V. ROBERTS, K. B., ET AL.

  91-7153   RITCHERSON, DAVID H. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7154   MENDEZ, MANUEL V. UNITED STATES

  91-7156   PETILLO, JOSEPH V. McCLELLAN, SUPT.

  91-7157   OWENS, MICHAEL W. V. MURRAY, DIR., VIRGINIA DOC

  91-7158   ZIMMERMAN, STACEY V. PENNSYLVANIA

  91-7160   ATEN, BONNIE, ETC. V. NEUBERT, CALVIN, ET AL.

  91-7162   PARZIALE, DAVID M. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7163   ROLLINS, GARY V. TENNESSEE

  91-7164   REINBOLD, WILFRED V. DEWEY COUNTY BANK

  91-7165   MARIN, MEL M. V. BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY

  91-7166   LOVINGS, PAUL A. V. VIRGINIA

  91-7171   JUSTICE, EUNICE V. LTV STEEL CO., INC., ET AL.

  91-7172   HUFFSMITH, DON V. WYOMING CTY, PRISON BD.

  91-7177   SIRECI, HENRY V. FLORIDA

  91-7178   YEATTS, RONALD D. V. VIRGINIA

  91-7183   FERGUSON, KELVIN D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7204   HARRIS, RICHARD R. V. SIVLEY, WARDEN

  91-7207   CONNER, KEVIN V. INDIANA

  91-7210   WAGGONER, DAVID V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ

  91-7212   LOWE, JON M. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7213   HARDY, CHESTER V. LeCUREUX, WARDEN

  91-7220   MILLER, WILLIAM C. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7221   PHILLIPE, CARLY J. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7225   RUGGLES, CHARLES F. V. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

  91-7226   ALBURY, FREDERICK W., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7230   BATTS, DONALD V. UNITED STATES

  91-7235   MINOTA-GUERRERO, ANGELICO V. UNITED STATES

  91-7237   McFADDEN, CRAWLEY D. V. DERWINSKI, SEC. OF VET. AFFAIRS

  91-7238   WARD, CHERYL V. WARD, MARTIN R.

  91-7241   KENNEDY, JIM L. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7254   ANDREWS, TOMMIE L. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC

  91-7259   FAIRMAN, CURTIS C. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7261   GOMEZ, CONRADO J. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7265   DIAZ, FABIO V. TERRELL, TAMMIE B., ET AL.

  91-7266   ROGERS, PAUL V. UNITED STATES

  91-7267   PELAEZ-CARMONA, CARLOS V. UNITED STATES

  91-7268   MORENO, BAYRON V. UNITED STATES

  91-7281   LAWSON, DAVID D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7284   HARRISON, DOLDRIDGE V. UNITED STATES

  91-7289   CANO, MIGUEL V. UNITED STATES

  91-7290   STRAUGHTER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES

  91-7291   HERNANDEZ, TOMA R. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7296   HARPER, KAREN S. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7297   WILLIAMS, GENE E. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7303   SAMUELS, REGINALD V. HAWLEY, WARDEN

  91-7305 ) PINK, ISRAEL V. UNITED STATES
          )
  91-7349 ) RODNEY, SANDRA W. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7306   OSEGUERA-LUCATERO, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES

  91-7307   POOLE, EDWARD O. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7310   ARACHE, FRANK V. UNITED STATES

  91-7318   MALONE, MARTINEZ V. UNITED STATES

  91-7319   STEWART, CECIL V. UNITED STATES

  91-7321   ZEPEDA, DANIEL V. DORSEY, DONALD, ET AL.

  91-7322   CRUM, EDWARD L. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7324   THOMPSON, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES

  91-7329   MATA, JUAN A. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7330   OAKLEY, ROBERT W. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7331   MURACCIOLE, ROQUE A. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7334   GRUNDEN, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES

  91-7338   FOWLER, DONNIE D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7341   SKILLERN, STEVEN R. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7346   MOORE, NATHANIEL V. DPTY. COMMR., ST. CORR. INS.

  91-7353   GILES, ERIC V. UNITED STATES

  91-7357   ROARK, BENJAMIN A. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7359   SMYLIE, STEVE V. UNITED STATES

  91-7361   BAUMAN, HIRAM L. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7362   VACCARO, DWIGHT C. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7364   ABADIA, LUCELLY V. UNITED STATES

  91-7368   GILBERT, CLEM R. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7369   JOHNSON, ROLAND V. UNITED STATES

  91-7372   WILLIAMS, ORTHNELL D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7373   MINICONE, JACK J. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7374   MAYA, JAIME V. UNITED STATES

  91-7382   ABREGO, MIGUEL A. V. UNITED STATES

  91-7393   DOE, JANE V. GROSS, MONA ET AL.

  91-7396   GREENE, ALONZO V. SENKOWSKI, SUPT., ET AL

  91-7418   SAVAGE, JOHN V. UNITED STATES

  91-7422   JOZWIAK, JEROME, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

                     The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

  90-1861   GREENVILLE PUB. SCH., ET AL. V. WESTERN LINE DIST., ET AL.

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

                Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.

  91-977  ) DIST. 6, INTL. UNION V. NLRB
          )
  91-1025 ) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ASSN. V. NLRB, ET AL.

  91-1040   PENTHOUSE INTL. V. MEESE, EDWIN, ET AL.

                     The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

                Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or

                decision of these petitions.

  91-996    CALIFORNIA V. CRIBAS, CESAR E.

                     The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency

                executed by respondent is granted. The petition for a

                writ of certiorari is denied.

  91-1002 ) YOUNG & RUBICAN, INC. V. MIDLER, BETTE
          )
  91-1199 ) MIDLER, BETTE V. YOUNG & RUBICAN, INC.

                     The motion of American Association of Advertising

                Agencies, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus

                curiae in No. 91-1002 is granted. The petitions for

                writs of certiorari are denied.

  91-1009   SCHOWENGERDT, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

  91-1159   MOURADIAN, RAYMOND V. JOHN HANCOCK COMPANIES

                     The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed as

                a veteran are granted. The petitions for writs of

                certiorari are denied.

  91-1196   HEGGY, T. L. V. HEGGY, CATHERINE A.

  91-1331   PIPEFITTERS' ASSN., #597 V. DANIELS, FRANK

  91-6681   SMITH, JERRY D. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6685   CALDERON, ELADIO A. V. UNITED STATES

  91-6830   BARRETT, FRED MARLIN V. UNITED STATES

  91-6849   FRIERSON, JEROME V. UNITED STATES

                     The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

                Justice White would grant certiorari.

  91-1216   SUTHERLAND, JAMES V. SUTHERLAND, BRONTE

                     The motion of Institute in Basic Life Principles,

                et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is

                granted. The motion of Lincoln Legal Foundation for

                leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The

                petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

  91-1236   ABRAHAM, DIST. ATTY. OF PHILADELPHIA V. HARRIS, MARTIN

                     The motion of respondents for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of

                certiorari is denied. Justice White would grant

                certiorari.

  91-1240   ENGELKE, DANIEL V. SCHER, GREGORY

  91-1280   ZANT, WARDEN V. HORTON, JIMMY L.

                     The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in

                forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of

                certiorari are denied.

  91-7239   MOUNT, CHARLES M. V. UNITED STATES

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

                Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or

                decision of this petition.



                           HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

  91-7451   IN RE TYRONE LEE

                     The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.



                             MANDAMUS DENIED

  91-7084   IN RE RACHEL C. MARTIN

  91-7085   IN RE ROBERT S. MEADE

  91-7256   IN RE CHARLES COX

  91-7428   IN RE ORVILLE JOHNS

                     The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.



                            REHEARINGS DENIED

  91-899    SLOAN, LORIN V. UNITED STATES

  91-5477   BROWN, LONNIE J. V. UNITED STATES

  91-5613   WADE, JOHNNY L. V. GEORGIA

  91-6199   KENNEDY, EDWARD D. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC, ET AL.

  91-6225   AHMED, ABUL A.M. V. STONE, SEC., DEPT. OF ARMY

  91-6334   CHALK, OCANIA V. HARRISON, ROBERT, ET AL.

  91-6469   SMYTHE, STEWART V. GREEN, S. ARCHER, ET AL.

  91-6474   STONE, WILLIAM V. DALLMAN, WARDEN

  91-6514   WHITE, LEROY V. ALABAMA

  91-6523   LOMBARD, JOHN F. V. NEW YORK CITY BD. OF ED.

  91-6563   BRYMER, RICHARD E. V. HESSON, WARDEN, ET AL.

  91-6649   GREENE, HERBERT V. TELEDYNE ELECTRONICS

                     The petitions for rehearing are denied.

  91-5694   FERGUSON, JOHN V. GIANT FOODS, INC.

                     The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice

                Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of

                this petition.




                          MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION

                     The written motions for admission of the following

                lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: